Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collective Bargaining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Medina council corrects police contracts after pension pickup error, approves sergeants deal but rejects emergency clauses
Summary
Council approved a three‑year sergeants contract that provides 4% raises each year but declined emergency enactment for corrected ordinances; members debated whether to reopen patrol and dispatch contracts after a pension‑pickup limit made a previously approved 3%+1% provision legally impossible.
Medina City Council’s finance committee on the evening reviewed and corrected errors in recent police labor agreements after staff discovered dispatchers were already at the pension pickup limit and could not accept the 3% plus 1% pension‑pickup formula the council had approved earlier.
Mayor Shields explained staff discovered the dispatchers’ pension system had reached its maximum pension pickup and asked the council to repeal and reissue affected ordinances so the groups could be aligned. Shields said the dispatchers and sergeants ultimately settled on 4% raises across each of the three years, and the sergeants’ contract (4%/4%/4%) was presented for approval. Council moved and approved the sergeants’ agreement, with one abstention recorded during the vote.
Council then considered adding an emergency clause to speed administration of the corrected ordinance so retro reports and pension filings would not have to be done twice. Multiple motions to add emergency clauses on the sergeants and communications/dispatch ordinances failed on separate votes. Members expressed frustration about how attorneys on both sides failed to catch the pension limit at the bargaining table; the city law director and other counsel described the situation as a legal impossibility that required repeal and reissuance of the ordinance language.
Members discussed options for the patrol officers’ contract, including doing nothing (leaving the original 3% + pickup in place), reopening negotiations, or repealing and replacing the ordinance so all three police labor groups would be treated the same. Some council members argued reopening the patrol contract would allow the city to renegotiate other terms; others warned a reopened negotiation could require concessions on both sides. A motion to repeal and replace the patrol officers’ ordinance with 4%/4%/4% failed.
The committee left the record with formal corrections to dispatcher ordinances planned and the sergeants’ contract adopted; emergency enactments were not approved, and the patrol officers’ contract remained as previously approved unless the council later reopens bargaining.
