House Education reviews miscellaneous education bill; considers moratorium exemption, compact readoption and pause on class-size enforcement
Loading...
Summary
The House Education committee reviewed a miscellaneous education bill that would exempt ownership changes at therapeutic approved independent schools from the 2023 moratorium, readopt the interstate education compact, rename BOCES references to cooperative educational service areas, delay class-size enforcement until rules or 07/01/2027, and consider background-check authority and an early-college study. No votes were taken.
The House Education committee met Feb. 25 to walk through a miscellaneous education bill and possible additions, focusing on ownership exemptions for therapeutic approved independent schools, rejoining the interstate education compact, renaming boards of cooperative educational services, a delay in enforcement of class-size penalties and proposed background-check authority for school contractors.
Legislative counsel (Speaker 3) summarized the bill’s main parts: an exemption to the 2023 moratorium on initial approvals of new independent schools for cases where a therapeutic approved independent school experiences a change in ownership and an application for initial approval is required; reinstatement of the interstate compact for education (adding a new chapter 35 to Title 16); broad renaming of BOCES references to cooperative educational service areas; and a provision that would prevent a school's failure to comply with class-size minimums from counting toward the three consecutive years of noncompliance that could trigger consolidation until the State Board adopts rule updates or until July 1, 2027, whichever comes first.
On the moratorium exemption, counsel explained the intent: "the moratorium on approval of new independent schools would not apply to changes in ownership for a therapeutic approved independent school," and the State Board and agency would be required to process such applications according to law. Committee members pressed for tighter limits to prevent a new owner from changing a school's therapeutic status after the exemption applies; Speaker 3 agreed the language could be clarified so the exemption applies only if the school remains a therapeutic approved independent school at the time of the change.
Members discussed practical trade-offs. Speaker 2 noted the immediate goal in at least one case is to prevent a school from closing; others asked whether the exemption should be limited to nonprofit buyers. Speaker 1 warned that restricting buyers to nonprofits could make it harder to find purchasers and prolong closures.
On the interstate compact, counsel said Vermont had previously belonged to the compact until the early 1990s and that rejoining would mainly add chapter language about the commission’s operations. "I have not identified any unintended consequences" so far, Speaker 3 said, but added the office will continue to review. Committee members also flagged a likely membership fee and questioned whether rejoining should be made explicit rather than continuing informal participation.
The bill’s renaming of BOCES drew technical discussion about exact phrasing (e.g., "cooperative educational service areas" versus other variants). Speaker 3 said the conforming amendments are largely non-substantive and pledged to verify the national organization’s preferred terminology and make uniform changes across statutes.
Section 13 drew lengthier debate. Speaker 3 described a proposal to add "harmless" language to Act 73 to avoid using a school’s failure to meet class-size minimums as the trigger for consolidation before the State Board adopts rules reflecting the new minimums. "A school's failure to comply with class size minimum requirements shall not count towards the 3 consecutive school years of non compliance that that enables the secretary to recommend action to the state board until the state board adopts updates to EQS to reflect class size minimums or...07/01/2027," Speaker 3 read.
Committee members said the change is intended to align statutory enforcement with rulemaking and school-construction aid so districts are not forced toward consolidation before funding or administrative rules are in place. Speaker 4 described "significant angst" in the field, saying the issue has affected budgets, local closure decisions and even job losses; Speaker 5 added that some principals report sharp enrollment changes tied to early-college participation in small schools.
Separately, the committee discussed an agency request to authorize background checks for AOE staff who work in schools. Speaker 2 also described a nonprofit proposal that contractors working for the Agency of Education in contact with children should have at least a Level 1 criminal background check, citing a previous noncriminal but inappropriate photography incident that raised concern about contractor screening.
Members flagged early college as a larger issue requiring study. Speaker 5 requested a deeper dive into whether early-college arrangements — currently limited to public postsecondary institutions, committee members said — are producing uneven impacts in small communities and on subsequent college attendance.
No formal votes or floor amendments were taken at the session. The committee agreed to continue work next week, with counsel offering to revise statutory language (for example, tightening the ownership exemption and finalizing terminology changes) and to gather more detail on the agency’s proposed background-check procedures.
The committee is scheduled to reconvene for further review and possible amendments next week.
