Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment And Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission declines to add Israel-support resolution; public forum features heated accusations
Summary
A proposed add-on resolution expressing full support for Israel was not added to the agenda after legal counsel advised it substantially repeated a prior item; the citizens forum that followed included sharply worded public criticisms, accusations of antisemitism and defenses from multiple speakers.
A motion to add an on-the-fly resolution expressing full support for Israel and to prohibit city relationships with jurisdictions that support terrorist organizations failed on a 2–2 split after the city attorney advised the proposed language substantially duplicated a resolution considered at the prior meeting and city code bars reintroduction within a three-month period unless a formal reconsideration occurs.
City Attorney Alan told the commission the document before the dais was a memo, not a drafted resolution, and said the code limits reintroducing substantially similar items. One commissioner argued the new language differed enough to consider it a new resolution, but the motion to add the item to the agenda did not gain the required majority.
During the citizens forum several speakers criticized the commission's prior handling of a sister-city matter and made direct accusations about elected officials. George Bartmesser told the commission: "Four commissioners put their own petty grievances ahead of the common good," and urged voters to consider the November election. Ari Steiger said he was "disgusting with this dais" and criticized what he described as the commission's response to the sister-city issue.
Other public commentators raised related claims about social-media posts and a local magazine profile. Jody Joseph said accusing the commissioners of antisemitism was "absolutely outrageous," referenced material she said was documented on Facebook and in the Sunny Isles Beach Magazine, and asked that names not be spoken aloud during the forum.
The city attorney reminded speakers that the commission meeting is a limited public forum and that comments that are impertinent, slanderous or directed at private individuals are not permitted under the code. Staff also clarified that proxy speaking (having another person speak on behalf of a resident) is not allowed unless coordinated with the city clerk; an attempted translation/proxy for Leonid Katz was ruled out under that guidance.
Discussion during and after public comment focused on decorum and the limits of permissible public criticism; the meeting closed after a brief closing message urging vigilance against inflammatory rhetoric and then adjourned.
