Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permits Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Works committee tables change to no‑permit penalty, refers issue to Planning & Zoning
Summary
Councilmembers debated reducing the no‑permit penalty multiplier for homeowners found to have begun construction without permits, with concerns the current penalty structure both deters noncompliance and burdens low‑income residents. The committee voted to table the proposal and asked Planning & Zoning for further analysis.
Get email alerts on the Permits Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Public Works committee on July 9 considered amending the parish code to revise the penalty for starting construction without a permit. Councilman Scott Rossoneri described a recent case where fees escalated significantly after the inspection and enforcement process and asked whether the current "1 plus 2" penalty (base fee plus double) might be altered to a "1 plus 1" approach to reduce the burden on some homeowners.
Colleagues and staff discussed the policy tradeoffs. Supporters of the existing structure said a steeper penalty serves as a deterrent to avoid a culture of noncompliance, while others argued the rules can disproportionately affect low‑income residents, non‑English speakers or one‑off cases where emergency or safety conditions apply.
Planning and zoning staff and committee members recommended a data‑driven review. Several councilmembers suggested options to preserve enforcement while providing administrative discretion or a path to reduce penalties after corrective action is taken. Marcus Broussard proposed a mechanism where the doubled penalty could be partially refunded if the property owner promptly corrected the violation and completed the permitting process.
After discussion the committee voted to table the amendment and refer the matter to the Planning & Zoning Department for additional data collection and recommendations.
Next step: Planning & Zoning was asked to analyze permit and enforcement data, estimate revenue impacts of a penalty change, and return with options for the council to consider.

