Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bill would let state prosecutors order limited digital evidence preservation in serious claims involving officers

House Judiciary Committee · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB 351 would allow an attorney general or state's attorney to authorize targeted collection and secure storage of digital evidence (plate readers, cell-site and work-device data, GPS, facial recognition) when there is a credible allegation of violent or constitutional misconduct by officers; sponsors said strict court orders and restricted disclosure would protect privacy.

Delegate Moon described HB 351 as an evidence‑preservation measure to collect and store for later judicial review digital data in cases where a state's attorney or the attorney general finds a credible allegation of violent or constitutional misconduct by an officer. Supporters said the bill would preserve evidence that can disappear quickly and that it would include narrow gatekeeping and court-order release procedures.

Proponents argued the bill…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans