Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Meals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nutrition director outlines USDA meal rules, participation figures and food-service finances
Summary
Diana Cooley, the district's nutrition services director, reviewed USDA meal-pattern rules, portion and calorie limits, meal participation counts and reimbursement rates; she highlighted local farm purchases and said food-service operations ran at a surplus that will need a plan for fund-balance spending.
Diana Cooley, the Princeton Public School District’s nutrition services director, told the board that federal (USDA) meal-pattern rules require schools to offer five components (meat or meat alternates, grain, fruit, vegetable and milk) and allow students to form a reimbursable meal by taking at least three components with at least one fruit or vegetable.
Cooley, presenting on the district’s nutrition program, said the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act sets calorie, sodium and fat ranges for different grade groups and that Princeton uses an offer-vs-serve model so students may decline some items. She showed examples of portion sizes and explained that meat portions are measured by weight and that some menu items (for example, sloppy joes) require larger cooked weights to meet the meat-crediting rules.
The nutrition director described participation and finance figures from last school year: the district served about 403,000 lunches and roughly 158,000 breakfasts (the presentation also cited average daily figures of about 2,400 lunches and 1,000 breakfasts). Cooley said the district receives $4.64 in federal reimbursement for a paid lunch and $2.37 for a breakfast; she reported average tray food costs of about $2.90 for lunch and $2.03 for breakfast.
Cooley described local procurement and farm-to-school efforts: the district buys produce seasonally from local suppliers (Upper Lakes Foods and Stony Brook Farms were cited) and recently began receiving farm-to-school beef from Petit Farms, with raw ground beef orders of about 700 pounds per month. She also documented summer-meal participation (the district served nearly 4,000 breakfasts and just over 9,000 lunches during its busiest summer) and noted the district runs multiple service lines, grab-and-go options and limited a la carte operations at secondary schools.
Board members asked about impacts from universal free-meal policies and how staff prepare for unexpectedly large increases in demand; Cooley said staff rely on historical production records but that sudden spikes are difficult to meet when meals are scratch-cooked. She told the board the department has new ovens at the high school, is investing in staff training and is exploring software and equipment investments as part of a plan to use fund balances within statutory limits.
The board thanked Cooley and members emphasized food service as a steady department that deserves support as broader budget pressures are analyzed.
