Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the District Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board sets 2026–27 enrollment parameter at 3,175; calendar survey, staffing and closed session follow

Princeton Public School District Board of Education · January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After discussing survey results and class-size guidance, the Princeton school board voted to set the district's 2026–27 K–12 enrollment parameter at 3,175 and then moved to a closed meeting to discuss negotiation strategy; community comment raised concerns about safety communications.

The Princeton Public School District board on Jan. 15 voted to set the district’s 2026–27 K–12 enrollment parameter at 3,175 after a discussion of enrollment estimates, class-size guidelines and a recent community survey.

"I'd like to make a motion to estimate the 2026–27 K–12 enrollment at 3,175 students," a board member recorded as Melissa said during the meeting; Jen seconded the motion and the board voice-voted 'aye.' The motion carried.

Administrators described the enrollment discussion as part of annual parameter-setting for budget and staffing planning. Staff noted kindergarten cohort changes and that online-enrollment totals factor into the overall parameter. One board member said brick-and-mortar kindergarten enrollment stood at about 180 this year and projected about 187 for next year, and administration cautioned that demographic shifts could affect projections.

Board members also reviewed a school-calendar survey with roughly 620 community responses and approximately 293 staff responses. The administration summarized community preferences that were split on starting before Labor Day and that staff strongly favored ending the school year in May; calendar scenarios under consideration aim to balance community desires, staff preferences and neighboring-district calendars.

During the public-comment period, a resident, Katie (speaker 5), urged clearer district communication on safety matters and asked why there had been no public messaging regarding incidents she described. "Your silence speaks volumes," she told board members, and the chair said staff would follow up using her contact information.

After completing business, the board moved into a closed meeting to discuss negotiation strategy. The motion to enter closed session was made and seconded on the record and approved by voice vote.

No additional formal votes on the calendar or related budget items were taken at the meeting; administrators said calendar options and related staffing proposals will return to the board for action at a future meeting.