Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves purchase of up to $137,000 for 71‑passenger school bus after debate over new vs. off‑lease options
Summary
After debate over warranty, braking systems and a roughly $30,000 price gap between new and off‑lease options, the Arlington Public Schools Board approved a motion to purchase a 71‑passenger school bus not to exceed $137,000.
Get email alerts on the School Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Arlington Public Schools Board of Education voted to approve the purchase of a 71‑passenger school bus with a price cap of $137,000 after a lengthy discussion about warranty, mileage and braking systems.
Board members weighed two options: a brand‑new vehicle with a longer warranty and specified features, and an off‑lease bus with roughly 25,000–30,000 miles that could cut the up‑front cost by about $30,000. Administration noted the new bus would include a manufacturer warranty covering early defects; the used option would carry less remaining warranty and might show the typical minor repairs that occur after a vehicle has been in service for a couple of years.
The board discussed technical and operational differences: some off‑lease buses use hydraulic brakes while newer models use air brakes, a distinction that affects driver licensing and handling; adding air conditioning and increasing capacity from 65 to 71 seats were identified as additional costs (the larger capacity was cited as roughly +$2,800). Leasing options were also described: a typical lease example reviewed had a three‑year term with a per‑year mileage allowance and an option to purchase at lease end.
One board member framed the decision in long‑term value terms: “Is $30,000 worth the actual warranty and a two‑year deal?” Another asked how many miles a bus typically accumulates annually; administration estimated 10,000–20,000 miles depending on routes. Administrators said a used bus could be taken into possession before August, while a new bus might not be delivered until December and payments could be spread across fiscal years.
After discussion, a board member moved to approve the purchase not to exceed $137,000; the motion was seconded and carried on a voice vote. The district plans to finalize vendor negotiations and return with payment and delivery details to the administration for processing.
The approval allows the district to pursue the new‑bus option with the additional capacity and warranty protections but does not yet specify the final vendor or exact delivery date. Administration said it will coordinate payment splits across current and next fiscal budgets if necessary.

