Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Secondary Education Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
High‑school scheduling committee weighs tradeoffs; stakeholder input planned
Summary
The committee reported it has reviewed models (A/B block, 7/8/9‑period days) and research suggesting no single schedule drives achievement; discussion focused on instructional minutes, credit opportunities, late/soft start options and plans for town halls and video outreach.
The high‑school scheduling committee updated the education committee on its work visiting other districts and constructing mock schedules. The presenters noted the literature does not show a single schedule reliably boosts achievement; instead the committee is assessing tradeoffs such as instructional minutes per course, teacher efficiency, credit opportunities and possible behavior/culture effects of fewer class transitions.
Committee members discussed late or soft start options, transportation implications and whether intervention time should be mandatory for some students. The group proposed stakeholder engagement (town halls, videos, targeted surveys to parents, students, principals and staff) as the next step to gather broad feedback before any recommendation to the full board.
No schedule change was proposed at this meeting; the committee will collect stakeholder input and refine options.
