Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Search Consultant Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears two search consultants, defers selection pending contract review
Summary
The Spring Grove Area SD board heard 15-minute presentations from Dr. Edward Albert (Albert Consulting/PARS) and Connie Kindler (Connie R Kindler Educational Consulting LLC) about superintendent-search options, timeline and fees; trustees asked staff and legal counsel to review contracts and nondisclosure clauses and will vote on a firm at the next meeting.
The Spring Grove Area SD board opened the personnel portion of its meeting to hear presentations from two search consultants after receiving public comments about transparency in the district's recent superintendent transition.
Dr. Edward Albert of Albert Consulting, representing the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools (PARS), described a search model that centers on stakeholder surveys, community engagement, video screening (he said his team uses the SparkHire platform), thorough reference checks and weekly updates to the board. Albert emphasized both transparency and necessary confidentiality for personnel matters: earlier-stage applicant names can be kept confidential to protect current employees and finalists would be publicly disclosed. He reported early recruitment activity, saying the district's advertisements had "over 200 impressions," and that he had received 11 cover letters and six completed applications.
Consultant Connie Kindler described a customized search process built from stakeholder input, focus groups and a district profile, and said she offers mentoring and first-year supports for newly hired superintendents. She outlined a typical timeline of roughly 3½ to 5 months (adjustable based on stakeholder involvement) and quoted fees of $19,000 for a traditional search and $16,000 for a hybrid model that shares work with district staff.
Board members asked detailed questions about nondisclosure provisions, contractual terms and consultant exclusivity. One trustee urged legal staff to "take a legal look" at nondisclosure clauses and contract language; another asked whether consultants would work exclusively for Spring Grove during the search. Several members also raised the option of conducting an in-house or hybrid search to reduce cost, while others defended consultants' greater capacity for vetting and broader networks. The board agreed to give staff and counsel time to review the consultants' contracts and nondisclosure language, requested any callouts by Friday, and moved a formal vote on selecting a consulting firm to the next board meeting.
No final hiring decision or contract award took place at this meeting.
