Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Energy Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
As solar nears operation, district weighs SREC sale terms and supply contracts
Summary
With its solar array nearing commissioning, the district discussed offers to sell SRECs and options for future supply contracts; staff warned the board to confirm how net-metering sell-back rates would interact with supplier offers before signing.
As the district’s new solar array nears full operation, facilities and business staff told the Facilities Finance Committee they need to choose representation for selling solar renewable energy certificates (SRECs) and to select a supplier structure that avoids unintended capacity or transmission charges.
Business manager (speaker 1) summarized market options presented by the district’s energy broker and prospective partners. He said a recommended vendor offered to handle SREC sales for a fee described as "not to exceed $2.50 per SREC," which staff contrasted with the market-standard 10% commission that can be more costly depending on trading prices. For context, staff told the committee current Pennsylvania SREC trades were in the mid-$30s per certificate.
The committee discussed timing: SRECs are sold after accumulation of 12 months of generation, so the district needs representation in place by July 1 to be active in the market during the first available sell window. The business manager also laid out options for how to receive proceeds (lump sum, CDs, phased payments).
Separately, staff reviewed supplier offers for energy supply and proposed contracting approaches that would avoid charging transmission and capacity on prior-period peaks. The recommended supplier was AEP in a 12‑month proposal; staff emphasized the importance of confirming whether a supplier’s retail rate would affect the district’s sell-back price for exported power under PPL net‑metering rules. Board members asked staff to confirm whether the sell-back (export) price is linked to supplier selection and to run spreadsheet scenarios comparing expected generation to usage.
No vote was taken. Staff were asked to return with: (1) verification of what the district would receive for exported energy under PPL net‑metering and whether suppliers in the auction preserve that sell-back rate; and (2) an updated spreadsheet showing expected annual generation, likely SREC counts, and modeled proceeds under alternative fee structures.
