Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents, students defend coach Mike Bauer; board limited in response by counsel advice
Summary
Multiple community members, students and family members urged the Northern Lehigh School Board to clear middle‑school coach Mike Bauer of recent allegations, described positive experiences with him, and asked for thorough investigations; the board noted it could not respond on personnel matters per counsel.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A sustained public‑comment period at the Northern Lehigh School Board meeting focused on allegations raised about a middle‑school coach and a wave of community response urging support for him.
Francine Meshey (speaker 15), who identified herself as a volunteer basketball and soccer coach, told the board she had coached alongside Michael Bauer since 2018 and described no inappropriate conduct in her experience. "To me, Mike is what Northern Lehigh stands for," she said, calling the prior accusations false and urging the board to consider petition signers and witnesses who support the coach.
Several other speakers backed that account. Jill Blackbauer (speaker 5) said her son played under Mike Bauer and described the social and competitive context of middle school athletics, calling the allegations "straight up lies" and asking the board to review emails she said refuted the claims. Chad Cooper (speaker 20), who said he is Francine Meshey’s husband, and multiple students including Kellen Bauer (speaker 12) and Michael Bauer (speaker 16) echoed that the coach ran practices with assistants present and that parents who had concerns did not raise them directly with coaches.
Eric King (speaker 14) and other parents said they had compiled lists of supporters and described coach Bauer as a committed volunteer who has positively impacted student athletes. Several commenters said the dispute should not be played out publicly and asked the board to conduct a thorough investigation that considers all sides.
The chair reminded commenters that, "If we're commenting on personnel, I just wanna say this upfront...we probably can't respond on the advice of counsel," and said the board would listen but may not be able to answer questions publicly. The meeting record indicates the board repeatedly acknowledged both the desire to hear public input and the legal limits on discussing personnel matters in open session.
Transcript speakers made factual claims, allegations and rebuttals on the record; the board did not take a public vote or make a formal personnel decision during the meeting. Several speakers requested that the district provide a thorough investigation and that the coach’s name be cleared if allegations prove unsubstantiated.

