Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates updated cell-phone policy; some members want more community input before a vote
Summary
Members raised enforcement and equity concerns as the board discussed whether to adopt an updated electronic-device policy next week or wait for an April 9 presentation and broader community engagement; the solicitor said the current written policy allows devices for approved educational use.
JENKINTOWN, Pa. — Jenkintown School District trustees spent a substantial portion of their March 10 work session debating an updated electronic-device (cell phone) policy, with members split over approving the revision at the board’s next meeting or delaying adoption until after an April 9 staff presentation and broader community outreach.
The board discussed three options: pass the updated policy with the understanding it can be revised later; delay approval until after the April presentation and additional community input; or adopt interim language that empowers building-level enforcement. "We could delay it," one board member said, urging a community forum after the April 9 presentation so residents and parents on both sides of the issue could be heard.
Solicitor Justin clarified the district's current written policy: "Your current policy says electronic devices are permitted for use during the school day for approved educational purposes only. Otherwise, the board prohibits the use of electronic devices by students during the school day," he said. Justin added that the written policy is not fully congruent with current practice across all buildings, which is part of the reason for the update.
Several trustees emphasized enforceability. One member said the key issue is whether principals have clear, enforceable authority: "My fear is being wishy-washy on the issue…without having something enforceable for educators, any policy we put out is going to fall apart," the trustee said.
Board members also pressed for inclusive outreach. The superintendent and other trustees argued for multiple participation options (in-person and virtual) so people who cannot attend weekday meetings can give feedback. The board cited the value of virtual forums for higher attendance and suggested school-level engagement led by building principals to gather broader input while avoiding quorum issues at large public meetings.
The superintendent referenced an external review: "Digital Wellness Labs said, overall, a recent review of the evidence from 22 studies concluded that bans affect students' mental health, academic achievement, and the likelihood of experiencing or engaging in cyberbullying is nuanced and complex," and urged that policy be considered in the context of data and community feedback.
No vote was taken on March 10. Trustees said the matter will return for discussion and that a vote is possible at next week’s meeting, though several members supported waiting for the April presentation and additional outreach before final action.
