Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs ORS citations and inclusive language in instructional‑materials policy
Summary
Members compared a shorter 'green' draft and a longer proposed version of the instructional materials policy, debated where to place ORS citations, and favored broader inclusive phrasing ("sexual orientation and gender identity") rather than enumerated lists; they asked staff to synchronize versions for a work session.
The Policy Review Committee examined competing drafts of the district’s instructional materials policy (IIA), focusing on where to include state statute citations and how to phrase inclusive language.
Committee members compared a previously adopted “green” draft with a newer, lengthier proposed version. Staff noted the new draft adds ORS references; members discussed whether to place ORS citations inline or in the usual end‑of‑policy location. One member argued for consistency with other policies: keep ORS citations where the district normally lists statutes rather than inserting full statutory text into the body.
Members also debated wording that addresses sexual orientation and gender identity. The shorter draft used broader phrasing ("sexual orientation and gender identity"); another draft enumerated specific groups ("lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender"). Several members said they preferred the broader phrasing to be more inclusive.
The committee agreed to label the versions clearly (for example, "version 2") and directed staff to combine the green highlights with the proposed edits, place ORS citations in the standard policy location, and return a synchronized draft to the committee and the work session for further review.
