Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges Shoreham‑Wading River board to add turf fields; board refers proposal to facilities committee

Shoreham-Wading River Board of Education · December 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident told the board the district needs more turf fields and asked the board to place a turf‑field bond on a May 2025 proposition; the board said the idea is under review and will go to the Space and Facilities advisory committee for further consideration.

Mike Williams, a resident who identified himself as living at "3 Upper Causeway," used the public comment period on Dec. 10 to press the Shoreham‑Wading River Board of Education to pursue additional turf fields and a May 2025 proposition.

Williams said hundreds of taxpayers signed a petition supporting more turf fields and argued that many neighboring districts already offer multiple turf fields. He cited a neighboring district bond he said was $60 million with $45 million allocated to turf fields and argued turf fields are “safer, reducing the number of injuries, and provide greater accessibility.”

“Again, I thank the superintendent and the Shoreham Wading River Board of Education trustees for giving me the opportunity to voice the thoughts and perspectives of the hundreds of community taxpayers who signed a petition,” Williams said. He asked what the board’s present viewpoint was and whether the proposal could be placed on a May 2025 proposition.

Board President replied that the board has been discussing turf fields in both public and executive sessions and that no decisions have been finalized. Superintendent Poole said the item will be reviewed by the Space and Facilities advisory committee at its Dec. 17 meeting and that the committee — which includes resident members — will provide feedback to the board.

The board did not vote; it described the turf‑field idea as an ongoing discussion and outlined the advisory‑committee review as the next step. No dollar figures or a bond resolution were proposed or approved at the meeting.