Citizen Portal
Sign In

Board reviews FY27 draft showing $1.6 million increase; transportation, class-size mandates and special-education allocations highlighted

Missisquoi Valley School District #89 Board of School Directors · November 11, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed a preliminary FY27 budget draft that currently shows a roughly $1.6 million increase driven by salary and benefit placeholders, discussed class-size mandates under Act 73, transportation contracting and reallocated special‑education chargebacks; finance staff said draft 2 will refine staffing and contracted services.

Trustees reviewed draft 1 of the Missisquoi Valley School District #89 FY27 budget and spent the bulk of the meeting probing staffing, benefit assumptions and contract timelines.

Laura McAllister, director of finance and operations, told the board that draft 1 represents current staffing plus negotiated and placeholder increases and amounts to roughly a $1.6 million increase over FY26. "Draft 1 is an increase of 1,600,000," she said, and she identified $460,000 of that as benefit increases and about $1.1 million as salary-related increases built into the draft for planning purposes.

McAllister and other administrators walked trustees through several drivers: a negotiated $2,000 step for professional staff, placeholders for nonunion increases, and a reclassification that charges 80% of certain support staff to special education and 20% to general education. McAllister said that shift makes the special-education line look larger even where total district dollars are not dramatically different.

Board members raised operational issues the administration said would be addressed in later drafts: transportation contracting (the current vendor was on a one-year renewal and may be rebid), copier and contracted-service inflation, vacant positions (several vacancies at MVU, Highgate and Franklin), and a proposal to track alternative education costs in a separate object code.

Trustees also discussed Act 73 class-size requirements and the district's plan to align offerings and schedules so schools remain in compliance. Administrators emphasized they are monitoring class-size bands and using scheduling tweaks where needed to meet the standards.

On athletics and extracurriculars, finance staff noted an unresolved conversation about adjusting stipends and adviser compensation; the district is collecting comparative data from other districts before proposing changes. Administrators said the athletic trainer position remains budgeted but currently covered by contract when filled.

McAllister said draft 2 will include more precise contract estimates, staffing adjustments using planned attrition and the next round of negotiations for support staff. The board scheduled additional budget-focused meetings in December and January to present details to the public and solicit comment before formal adoption.

No budget vote was taken; the board directed staff to refine draft 2 with additional detail on cohort impacts, contracted services and revenue estimates.