Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates goals, outreach and a district newsletter to improve engagement
Summary
The board reviewed survey results and debated a three-column approach for parents, district, and staff metrics; members asked for better follow-up to public commenters, proposed quarterly community newsletters and opt-in email lists, and discussed student/teacher liaisons and advisory committee participation.
The Berlin Area School District board spent much of its meeting refining how it will measure and communicate progress on board goals, with members debating surveys, newsletters and liaison roles to improve parent and community engagement.
Board members reviewed a three-column survey layout intended to separate parent-directed metrics, district-level goals, and staff-focused measures. Nick (S1) and others said column 1 should be clarified as parent-focused, column 2 for district-wide metrics, and column 3 for staff. Members recommended narrowing long lists to a few measurable items and using short, targeted survey questions (one- or two-question prompts) pushed through newsletters or Google Forms to increase response rates.
Discussion turned to outreach: members proposed a combined quarterly community newsletter that would highlight three priority items from the board and include a way for recipients to identify themselves as parents, staff or community members. Staff (S2) said an opt-in email list and social channels (school pages, clerks, Constant Contact) could automate collection and distribution; S8 offered to gather email-open metrics for August. Several members suggested using existing clerks and community partners to broaden reach.
Board members also discussed better follow-up when members of the public speak during meetings. Several said a single, coordinated response — rather than ad hoc replies from different board members — would close the feedback loop and improve perception of responsiveness. The board agreed Nick, Allison and staff would draft newsletter proposals and outreach plans for the board to review.
On representation, members raised the possibility of inviting a student or teacher liaison (nonvoting) to provide perspective at committee meetings and of a rotating board liaison to advisory committees for observation, with clear limits to avoid blurring governance lines.
Next steps: S1 and S5 will work with Allison and staff to prepare newsletter drafts and outreach proposals for board review; staff will return metrics on survey engagement.
