Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Calendar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hardy County Schools board schedules electronic vote after debate over staggered start dates
Summary
At a meeting called to order at 4:34, the Hardy County Schools board reviewed five proposed academic calendars, discussed state calendar requirements and concerns about vocational students missing days when schools start on different dates, and set an electronic survey vote to close on the 20th.
Presenter (Speaker 1) opened the calendar item by defining the academic calendar and explaining how five proposed calendars were developed by school-level calendar committees that included administrators, staff, students and parents. “School calendar, also known as the academic calendar, is the schedule outlining key dates and events for the school year,” the Presenter said.
The Presenter summarized West Virginia Department of Education requirements cited to the board, including a 180-day instructional minimum, a 20-day employment term with specified non-instructional days and faculty senate meeting requirements. “The instructional term has to be 180 days,” the Presenter said, and outlined limits on weeks and allowable professional learning days.
The board heard that the county produced five calendar options for a public vote; the Presenter said Calendar 5 would start Aug. 20, while a second option for “Grant Pendleton” listed an Aug. 11 start and an Aug. 15 student start for that option. The Presenter said student start dates under the proposals ranged (as presented) from Aug. 15 to Aug. 27 and that last student days varied by option. “It came back, I believe there's only 1 vote for any other 1. It ended up being calendar 5,” the Presenter said.
Chair (Speaker 4) raised persistent concerns about staggered start dates. “I personally continue with the concern of, the different start dates,” the Chair said, noting the potential impact on students who attend off-site vocational programs. Committee member (Speaker 3) asked whether vocational attendance is tracked by county and whether transportation could be provided for students attending the tech program; the board discussed the difficulty of replicating hands-on vocational instruction at the high school and whether mini-courses could serve seniors.
Staff member (Speaker 2) described how the vote would be conducted electronically and tracked. “We'll get that out to vote tomorrow,” the staff member said, adding the survey will permit one vote per person and ask respondents to indicate which school they represent so the district can report per-school participation and identify non-voters.
Board members discussed the timing of spring break and a shifted half day at the end of the year; Committee member (Speaker 3) noted the previous last day had been a half day and described how the proposed shift preserves that half day while moving its position in the calendar. The board agreed to finalize the voting window and review results at the next meeting.
Procedural action: the Chair moved to adjourn, a second was acknowledged, an aye was recorded and the meeting was adjourned at about 5:08 p.m.
