Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Platteville board hears drop in FTEs and warns voucher expansion, virtual enrollment cut funding
Summary
District presenter Shelby told the board a fall FTE decrease of about 10 will reduce state-funded revenue; staff flagged 31 students open‑enrolled to virtual schools and said the state’s planned voucher expansion could shift more funding away from the district. Final equalized-aid percentages are expected mid‑month.
Shelby, the district presenter, told the Platteville School District board that the district’s third‑Friday head count produced a small but consequential decline in the fall full‑time‑equivalent (FTE) count — roughly 10 FTEs lower on the rolling three‑year average — which reduces the district’s state‑funded revenue. Shelby said the district’s current per‑pupil figure is $11,851 under the present state budget and that the preliminary Fund 10 revenue limit estimate is in the ballpark of $18.4 million, though she cautioned that the final revenue limit depends on additional variables and equalized‑aid percentages that the state will release around the 15th of the month.
Why it matters: FTE is a principal determinant of state aid. Shelby said the district uses the third‑Friday head count as a snapshot that sets fund‑10 revenue and that the fall FTE decrease will directly lower state funding tied to attendance. The district staff explained the FTE is a rolling, three‑year average intended to smooth sharp class‑size swings.
Shelby also described open‑enrollment patterns and virtual‑school outflows. The district reported roughly 31 students open‑enrolled out to virtual schools this year; Shelby said much of the $11,800 per‑student funding follows those students to the receiving virtual schools, with only a portion remaining in Platteville. Board members pressed for clarity on which virtual providers are driving enrollments; Shelby said local virtual programs and larger statewide providers contribute to the outflow and that some of the most aggressive recruiters operate in other regions of the state.
Board members raised the state‑level policy change often described as vouchers or expanded choice. Shelby reviewed the history briefly, saying the voucher program began in the early 1990s and noting that a broader removal of prior income thresholds will expand eligibility. Shelby warned the board that if voucher-style funding is expanded statewide it could create a new cost the state must fund, which could change how much aid districts receive. Shelby said the law limits district visibility into individual voucher recipients (address and family information are collected on application forms for open enrollment but may not be available for voucher recipients), making local planning more difficult.
What the board will do next: The district will monitor the state’s equalized‑aid release mid‑month and fold the final figures into budget planning ahead of the annual meeting. No formal action was taken; the presentation was informational.
