Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wausau School District officials say $1.3 million net reimbursement could fund a move to 3% staff pay target
Summary
District administrators told the board an unexpected roughly $1.3 million net increase—largely from higher special-education reimbursements—would allow the district to raise previously approved 1.5% salary authority toward a 3% CPI target; the board voted to accept administration's recommendation with recorded abstentions.
Administrators for the Wausau School District told the school board that recent state and federal funding changes produced an estimated $1.3 million net increase for the district and presented a proposal to use that money to increase staff salary authority.
Josh, the presenter, said the state’s biennial budget preserved a $325-per-student adjustment but did not increase the district’s state aid; higher special-education reimbursement rates, reduced title funds and greater open-enrollment costs together yield an estimated net increase of “about $1,300,000,” he said. “About $2,000,000 increase … the net change for the district is about $1,300,000,” Josh added.
The administration told the board that adding an estimated $1.2–$1.3 million to both revenues and expenditures would keep the preliminary budget balanced and that the special-education money is a reimbursement rather than an addition to the district’s revenue limit. Speaker 3 noted the federal government may release a portion of roughly $512,000 in title funds that had been withheld, but said details remain pending.
Why it matters: The administration proposed using the increased special-education reimbursement to raise the district’s staff salary budget authority from the 1.5% previously approved to a 3% target (roughly CPI). Officials estimated roughly $800,000 equals about 1% of the salary budget, making the proposed increase about $1.2 million in additional expenditures.
Board discussion centered on how to treat any surplus dollars and the relationship between this item and a separate discussion about the district’s authority to levy an additional $3.25 per pupil. One board member asked specifically about an $87,000 figure visible on the presenter’s slide and was told that remaining funds would likely remain in the fund balance until a later, more detailed budget presentation; the administration emphasized these are estimates and the district adopted only a preliminary budget in May and will update it in August and October.
A board member noted that even a precisely balanced budget will experience tens of thousands of dollars of variance over a $140+ million budget, and the administration said the district’s fund balance had fallen in part because of recent health-insurance overages.
The board voted to accept the administration’s recommendation to adjust budget authority as presented. The motion carried on a voice vote; the transcript records multiple abstentions including a board member who earlier stated they would abstain because teacher negotiations are handled separately.
The next steps: The administration will return with additional budget presentations in August and September and a final budget in October. The board did not adopt a new levy during this meeting; any decision about a $3.25-per-pupil levy will require a separate discussion and formal action.
