Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Viroqua Area School District board authorizes $1.3 million revenue‑limit exception, sets referendum

Viroqua Area School District Board of Education · August 20, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a resolution allowing the district to exceed its state revenue limit by $1,300,000 per year for three years for nonrecurring purposes and voted to place a companion referendum before voters to authorize the exception.

The Viroqua Area School District board on Aug. 14 approved a resolution authorizing the district to exceed its state revenue limit by $1,300,000 per year for three years for nonrecurring purposes and voted to put the question before voters in a referendum.

The measure was introduced by a board member (S1) and moved for approval by a board member (S5), who said the additional revenue is intended for nonrecurring needs. A second (S6) followed, and after brief discussion the board approved the resolution by voice vote. The board then approved a companion resolution to provide for a referendum election on that question; that motion was moved by a staff member (S2) and seconded by a director (S4) and likewise passed by voice vote.

Why it matters: Exceeding the revenue limit would allow the district to fund one‑time projects or costs without counting against the district's statutory revenue ceiling. Putting the question to voters gives the public a direct say on whether the district may use the additional levy capacity for the specified three‑year period.

Board remarks and process: During debate one board member (S6) said they would prefer a higher figure — “I’d really like to see it at 1.5,” — but did not move to change the amount. Another board member (S1) said they shared that preference but would not amend the motion at that time. No recorded dissenting votes were entered in the public record; the chair announced the motion carried.

Next steps: Because the board voted to provide for a referendum, the district will proceed with the legal steps and public notice required to place the revenue‑limit question on the ballot. The transcript did not include a date for the referendum; the district will set and publish the election schedule and required notice as required by state law.