Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Discipline Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears proposal for a Corrective Learning Center to limit out-of-school suspensions
Summary
High-school staff proposed a Corrective Learning Center for students as an in-school alternative to suspension to reduce lost instructional time and provide behavior remediation; the plan named Donna Reed as lead and described small cohorts, but non-negotiable offenses would still trigger suspension.
High-school administrators proposed creating a Corrective Learning Center to keep students in school while addressing behavioral issues and academic work.
A presenter explained that the center would serve as an intermediate step before out-of-school suspension, allowing students to remain in the building, complete assignments and participate in structured reflection and remediation. The presenter said the center's intent is to minimize lost instructional time, provide focused behavior conversations (conflict resolution, decision-making and reflection) and support staff in classroom management.
The plan names Donna Reed as the staff member who could operate the program within her current schedule and described using one or two rooms to keep groups small. "She currently is, she works with many of our at risk students who are credit deficient," the presenter said, noting Reed's experience with credit recovery programs and small-group instruction. The team said the maximum cohort would be about five students to preserve a productive learning environment and to avoid turning the room into a "vacation" out of class.
Board members responded with broad support for an in-school option while emphasizing that serious or illegal conduct (fighting, vaping, other nonnegotiables) would still require out-of-school suspension. Several members praised the proposed staff lead and cautioned that accountability to parents and consistent use of the center would be important.
What happened next: The board discussed the proposal and asked clarifying questions about staffing levels, capacity and how the center would be used; no formal board vote to adopt a policy was taken at the meeting.
Provenance: Proposal and description introduced by high-school staff (topic intro SEG 1220; topic finish SEG 1460).
