Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Homeowner, contractor and board agree on panelized porch infill instead of lattice at 425 South Gore

Webster Groves Architect Review Board · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At 425 South Gore Avenue the Architect Review Board and homeowner debated porch skirt options; the homeowner opposed open lattice and the board recommended panelized raised trim with drop panels matching the house’s Tudor timbering; the board approved the project with that clarification.

A tense but resolved exchange over porch skirt design at 425 South Gore Avenue ended with the Architect Review Board specifying a panelized infill rather than traditional open lattice.

During the public‑hearing item, contractor Brian (Custom Decks and Patios) described the proposed porch and options for the skirt. Several board members recommended the skirt use a panelized raised trim with inset drop panels to tie the porch visually to the house’s Tudor timbering and to provide discreet access panels for maintenance. Board members framed the recommendation as an architectural solution to maintain neighborhood character and durability.

Homeowner Katie objected strongly to open lattice. "I'm truly hate Lattice," she said, arguing that lattice often traps animals and breaks easily. The board and contractor responded by discussing several alternatives, including solid infill panels with vertical trim members and small access panels, and the homeowner agreed to a panelized approach that matches the timber color of the house.

The board moved to approve 425 South Gore with the clarification that porch faces be broken up with a raised trim and drop panels in the same material and color as the timber framing. The contractor agreed to produce revised details showing the panelized solution for the board’s files and permit application.

The motion passed as recorded in the meeting transcript; the board’s action requires the contractor to resubmit porch details that reflect the panelized treatment rather than open lattice.

Next steps: contractor to submit revised porch details aligning materials and color with the house’s timbering before final permitting. The board’s recorded motion and the homeowner’s objection are both included in the permit record.