Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Summer Remediation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees review summer remediation programs, district says 1M+ spent on certified instruction
Summary
Greenville County Schools staff reported on June summer remediation and support programs, including Read to Succeed third-grade camps, summer credit opportunities and supports for multilingual learners; trustees questioned retention rules, parent appeals and tuition charged for some virtual courses.
Get email alerts on the Summer Remediation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greenville County Schools staff on Tuesday reviewed the district’s June summer remediation and support programs, reporting that certified teachers provided instruction at a cost of more than $1,000,000 and that programming served students from elementary through high school.
Miss Dean, who presented program details, said elementary summer remediation targeted second and third graders at 18 host sites and that transportation, morning breakfast and lunch were provided. She said 3,599 total students attended summer programming; about 74% of participants were classified as pupils in poverty, and 24% of participants had disabilities. "Instruction was provided by certified teachers at a cost of over $1,000,000," Dean said.
The presentation singled out the third-grade Read to Succeed summer camps, which expanded this year after state law changes removed a literacy-portfolio good-cause exemption and broadened invitations. Dean summarized attendance and outcomes: 1,262 third-graders attended the district’s summer reading camps; 13 students who were required to attend did not, and per state law those non-attending students were retained in third grade. Ten families appealed retention decisions and, after district-level review of student work and artifacts, "those 10 students were promoted to the fourth grade," Dean said, describing the parent-appeal process as an opportunity for schools and families to present evidence that a student can do fourth-grade work.
Trustees pressed staff on the changes in eligibility language and the removal of the literacy-portfolio exemption. Miss Mosley asked for clarification on the distinction between prior labels such as "does not meet 1" and "does not meet 2." Dean explained that the state consolidated subcategories, which broadened invitations to the camps this year.
High-school summer offerings included three platforms (Greenville virtual, SC Virtual and Edgenuity) and in-person supports: two certified teachers and one floating teacher per site, plus floating science and social-studies teachers available via Google Meet. Dean reported 2,951 initial-course-credit enrollments, with 2,358 credits earned (about an 80% success rate); credit-recovery enrollments and completion rates were lower (542 credits earned at about a 75% success rate).
Board members also asked about tuition for some summer courses. A trustee asked why students who enroll "to get ahead" are charged; Dean and other staff explained that courses run through the Greenville County virtual program can include fees that pay the teachers who deliver and grade those courses, while courses through SC Virtual or Ingenuity (Edgenuity) do not charge students. "If it's not offered in Ingenuity or it is not offered in SC Virtual, the next place we look is the Greenville virtual program, and there is a charge," Dean said.
Why it matters: the discussion clarified how state policy changes altered district program demand and enrollment, how appeals are handled when retention is proposed, which students bore tuition costs for summer acceleration, and where district resources were directed.
The instruction section concluded without any new action items; trustees moved on to a test-score update presentation next.

