Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Caddo Parish Commission advances two ordinances, schedules Sept. 18 final vote; approves executive session

Caddo Parish Commission · September 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Sept. 2 work session commissioners voted to advance introduction of ordinance 65-61 (surplus property sale) by a 10–0 (2 absent) vote and to advance ordinance 65-48, which would appropriate $10 million for a pickleball park, for introduction (vote reported 8–2–2). The board also voted to convene into an executive session on pending litigation.

The Caddo Parish Commission moved forward on several items of new business during its Sept. 2 work session, advancing two ordinances for formal introduction and scheduling a public hearing and final vote for Sept. 18.

The board advanced the introduction of ordinance 65-61 of 2025, an ordinance to deem certain parish property surplus and authorize sale. Commissioner Ron Carthorn moved the motion and Parliamentarian Victor Thomas seconded; the clerk recorded the vote as 10 in support, none opposed, and 2 absent, and the motion passed.

The commission also advanced the introduction of ordinance 65-48 of 2025, which would amend the budget to appropriate $10,000,000 for construction of a pickleball park. Commissioner John Atkins made the motion and Commissioner Gregory Young seconded. Assistant administration staff explained that the Sept. 2 vote was for introduction only and that the final vote and public hearing are scheduled for the commission’s Sept. 18 meeting. The clerk reported the introduction vote as carried with 8 in support, 2 in opposition and 2 absent.

Finally, the board voted to convene an executive session related to pending litigation (case 659061). The chair moved the recess; the clerk recorded the executive-session motion as carried (10 in support, none opposed, 2 absent). The board recessed for five minutes to allow those not participating in the executive session to leave.

No final decisions on the ordinances were made at the Sept. 2 work session; both items were advanced for introduction and will return for public hearing and a final vote on Sept. 18.