Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wstu Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears detailed brief on education services at Western Secure Treatment Unit; parents press access to equipment
Summary
District staff described operations, compliance and grant-funded staffing for the Western Secure Treatment Unit education program; parents asked why tens of thousands in state-funded equipment are unavailable to AC Valley students and criticized fees for outside cyber students affecting team rosters.
Get email alerts on the Wstu Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Allegheny-Clarion Valley School Board on Tuesday heard a multi-staff presentation explaining how the district is running education services at the Western Secure Treatment Unit (WSTU) and how state grant funding and program rules shape access.
Director of education Kristen Thirlman said the district is operating the program under Title I Part D, subpart 1 obligations and federal and state grant terms, and that the district must comply with Chapter 4, 14, 15 and 16 regulations and coordinate with the Pennsylvania Department of Education. "What I do at Westview is to write, review, and submit the Title I school plan," Thirlman said, describing staff duties related to assessments, curriculum alignment and graduation supports.
Staff introduced at the meeting outlined day-to-day operations. Andrea Stewart, the district's business manager, said she is tracking $2,353,000 added to district accounts related to the program and is responsible for budget revisions and fiscal reporting. Anna Smith, the school psychologist, said roughly 75% to 80% of students at the facility receive special-education services and that IEP meetings must be held within 30 days of enrollment. IT administrator Ray Buck enumerated deployed hardware at the site, including 60 student Chromebooks, 12 teacher Chromebooks, 20 CAD workstations and 25 iPads, and said the district uses content-filtering (Securly) and device management (Jamf) to control access.
Public commenters pressed whether district students can use vocational equipment purchased for the secure facility. "Why are we spending $706,766 in something that is secure treatment that our children do not get the opportunity to use?" said Michael Bogos, who identified himself as a concerned parent. Board and district speakers replied that much of the WSTU funding came from state grant dollars and that the facility's security and residency rules limit physical access by non-resident students. A board representative said some staff time is charged to the grant and that the district's role is to provide education to students placed in the correctional facility rather than to run a general vocational center for the district.
District staff stressed the workload and compliance demands of operating the program. Julie Regan and other teachers described time-consuming transcript reviews for transient students and adjustments required by juvenile justice protocols. Attendance and enrollment staff outlined daily intake, scheduling and reporting duties. Thirlman said the district has about $88,000 from the Title I Part D funding available for transition services and vocational supports, with 15% to 30% of the funds required for transition services and the remainder available for educational enhancements.
The board did not take formal action on program policy during the meeting; staff said they will continue to meet weekly with program partners and state agencies and that questions about access and program rules may need to be addressed at the state or legislative level.

