Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits Medical topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DeSoto Parish consultants warn of health‑plan shortfall; urge 10–19% funding increase, stop‑loss change and review of retiree MAPD option
Summary
At the May 22 DeSoto Parish Finance & Operations Committee meeting, plan consultant Jason Wineland said the district’s self‑funded medical plan faces a projected multi‑hundred‑thousand to multi‑million dollar shortfall and recommended a 10–19% funding increase, shopping stop‑loss coverage and exploring a group Medicare Advantage for retirees.
Jason Wineland, a plan consultant, told the DeSoto Parish School Board Finance & Operations Committee on May 22 that the district’s self‑funded health plan is facing significant underwriting pressure and needs financial adjustments to remain stable.
Wineland said the district’s current claims experience could produce a deficit "of about 1,000,006, probably about 2,000,000 by the time the year runs out," and that under certain credibility assumptions the shortfall could be larger. "So my my assumption is that next year will be better. So I would say you should at least consider a 10% increase," he said, adding that a 19% increase would "get even" and 15% would be a conservative middle ground.
The consultant pointed to a small number of very large claims driving costs: "12 large claims... you have 12 people eating up 24% of all the claims paid," he said, and noted that stop‑loss reimbursements that had helped the plan in prior years are now under strain. Wineland said the district’s stop‑loss carrier, Sun Life, "is calling it quits" on current terms and recommended soliciting bids from other carriers, naming Gerber Life as an option and proposing raising the specific deductible to $350,000 to lower fixed stop‑loss premiums.
Wineland also proposed exploring a group Medicare Advantage (MAPD) product to remove post‑65 retirees from the district’s self‑funded risk. He said the district has about "399 retirees" in the post‑65 class and that a group MAPD could be effective Jan. 1 and would be funded by federal subsidies. "If you decide to do this, this is effective January 1," Wineland said, adding that the district would hold retiree meetings and work with individuals who lack Part A or Part B so nobody is left without coverage.
Staff and several committee members asked practical questions about implementation, payroll deductions and whether retirees would have to enroll in Part A/B. Wineland said those logistics would be addressed in outreach and that the consultants will "shop" the MAPD and stop‑loss markets and return with specific proposals. Committee members did not take a binding vote at the meeting; Wineland said he would begin securing quotes immediately to lock in underwriting terms and would report back at a follow‑up meeting in about a month.
Why it matters: The committee’s decisions about stop‑loss coverage, deductibles and whether to shift retirees to a group MAPD will affect the district’s fiscal exposure, the size of any contribution increases passed to active employees, and the budget outlook for 2025–26. Staff emphasized they will provide written proposals and benchmarking information before any rate or plan design changes are implemented.
What’s next: Consultants will solicit stop‑loss and MAPD quotes and return to the committee with concrete proposals and a recommended contribution change at the next meeting.
