Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Superintendent Search topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board to discuss permanent superintendent after talks with interim; members split on open search

Grant Public School District Board of Education · March 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members debated whether to start an open superintendent search or consider the interim superintendent, Kevin Aiken, for the permanent role. The board agreed to have conversations with Aiken and consider stakeholder input and timeline before deciding whether to pursue a broader search process with external partners.

Board members spent a substantial portion of the March 11 meeting debating next steps for the superintendent position, balancing continuity under Interim Superintendent Kevin Aiken against best-practice searches with community engagement.

Several board members praised Aiken’s performance. One member said, in support of internal continuity, that Aiken "knows the district" and has restored information flow and trust. Aiken responded in part with dry humor about the work ahead: "All I know is my wife told me to fix it. So I'm gonna fix it." Those advocating for an open process said best practice includes community input, candidate interviews and stakeholder meet-and-greets through partners such as MASB or NC RESA.

Board members described two possible next steps: (1) the board will have initial conversations with Aiken about whether he wants to be considered for the permanent role and, if so, under what terms (several suggested a one-year introductory contract as an option), and (2) if the board elects, it could launch a broader search with outside assistance and public interviews. Several directors emphasized that policy language and Michigan law do not force a specific search process and the board retains discretion, but they urged transparency and community involvement regardless of path.

The board did not take a final vote; members agreed to continue the discussion and to plan a public process for stakeholder input if they opt for an external search.