Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Discipline And Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cold Spring Harbor board moves toward bell-to-bell phone restriction for K–11, plans Yonder pouch pilot at junior-senior high
Summary
The Cold Spring Harbor board reviewed a proposal to ban phone use bell to bell for grades K–11 and to pilot Yonder pouches at the junior-senior high school, citing parent survey data showing broad support; trustees discussed enforcement, costs (~$30,000), medical accommodations and next steps for a second reading and vote.
The Cold Spring Harbor Central School District Board of Education on Monday heard a detailed plan to restrict students’ access to personal electronic devices during the school day and to pilot secure storage pouches at the junior-senior high school.
The district’s junior-senior high principal presented survey results and evidence the policy committee considered, saying 51% of parents who responded were “extremely concerned” about in-school phone access and that 84.2% expressed some level of concern; he said 87% of the roughly 200-parent responses supported restrictions during the school day. “We are proposing a bell-to-bell restriction on cell phone use for K through 11,” the principal said, while describing a more limited privilege for 12th graders and accommodations for documented medical needs.
The proposal would rely on Yonder pouches — sealed device sleeves that lock during school hours — for the junior-senior high building, and it would delegate building-level procedures to principals. The presenter framed the change as academic and social: removing distractions, improving engagement and, over time, supporting better mental health. He cited pilot data from other districts, describing a reported 70% reduction in classroom disruptions in one large high-school pilot and saying administrators observed gains in focus and GPA in that example.
Trustees and members of the public pressed for implementation details: how the district would handle tampering or attempts to defeat the pouch lock, disciplinary consequences for violations, how seniors would access devices for college work, and the projected cost. One trustee said a magnet could defeat some locks; the presenter replied that tampering would be detectable and that intentional destruction of school property would fall under the code of conduct and the district’s progressive-discipline framework, including potential confiscation and parent pick-up. He estimated pouch procurement and onboarding at roughly $30,000 and said the district could fund it by postponing planned flexible furniture purchases in the building budget.
Trustees also discussed alternatives such as lockable classroom cabinets, and asked for a clear procedure for medical accommodations and for parents who need urgent contact with their children. The principal said the school would continue to provide more than 100 phones that can dial out and that parents could contact the main office, assistant principals or counselors to reach students quickly.
Board members agreed to move the matter forward: the board waived a full first reading of policy 5695 and scheduled a second reading and a vote on adoption at the next meeting after building-level procedures and some wording changes are finalized.
The district will post draft procedures and an FAQ for families during the onboarding process; the presenter said Yonder reported durable pouches intended to last several years if cared for. The board asked administration to return with final regulations, budget details and a phased implementation plan before formal adoption.
