Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Washington Supreme Court hears argument on whether foreign convictions count toward offender score
Summary
On Nov. 19, 2024, the Washington Supreme Court heard oral argument in State v. Matthew Adam Lewis on whether "out of state" in the offender-score statute includes foreign-country convictions. Defense counsel argued the statute is ambiguous and the rule of lenity favors Lewis; the state urged a broad reading and comparability review for due process.
The Washington Supreme Court heard oral argument on Nov. 19, 2024, in State of Washington v. Matthew Adam Lewis over whether convictions from foreign countries may be counted toward a defendant's offender score under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act. Counsel for the appellant, Stephanie Taplin, asked the court to remand for resentencing, arguing that the offender-score subsection of RCW 9.94A is ambiguous and that ambiguity must be resolved in Mr. Lewis's favor under the rule of lenity.
Taplin told the court that the statute's use of the phrase "out of state" can reasonably be read two ways: (1) to mean other jurisdictions within the United States (including federal courts and courts-martial) or (2) to mean anywhere outside Washington state's borders, including foreign countries. "Federal or foreign country convictions do not count as points under Washington's offender score statute," Taplin said, arguing that…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
