Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Washington Supreme Court hears case on whether public employers must keep paying annual 21‑day military leave during extended active duty
Summary
The Supreme Court heard arguments in Travis Bearden v. City of Ocean Shores over whether Washington’s paid‑military‑leave law requires a public employer to pay a service member 21 days of leave each year even while the employee remains on extended active orders, and whether a reemployment requirement limits that entitlement.
The Washington State Supreme Court heard oral argument Jan. 16 in Travis Bearden v. City of Ocean Shores, a dispute over whether public employers must pay a 21‑day block of paid military leave each year to employees who remain on extended active orders and whether state law contains a separate reemployment requirement.
Thomas Girard, counsel for firefighter and appellant Travis Bearden, told the court the issue is “Ocean Shore's manipulation of the Washington Paid Leave statute for military service.” Girard argued the statute’s plain language requires employers to pay service members for days they were regularly scheduled to work during military leave and contains no limit on the type or length of military duty or any intervening reemployment requirement.
“Scheduled to work, within the context of the statute, is very clear,” Girard said, urging the justices to treat nontraditional schedules—such as 24‑ or 36‑hour firefighter shifts—as regular…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
