Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves 2024–25 BOCES administrative budget, advances candidate selections

East Aurora Union Free School District Board of Education · April 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its April 16 special meeting the East Aurora Union Free School District Board approved the 2024–25 BOCES administrative budget and approved a consolidated vote covering four candidates listed on the agenda; both motions passed unanimously, 6–0.

The East Aurora Union Free School District Board of Education on April 16 approved the 2024–25 BOCES administrative budget and advanced a consolidated vote on candidate selections, with both motions passing unanimously.

The board’s chair moved to “approve the resolution approving the 2024–25 QV QV2 BOCES Administrative Budget as detailed in your agenda,” and the assembly responded with a recorded “aye.” The motion carried 6–0. The transcript records the motion as presented on the agenda; no substantive amendments were offered during the meeting.

Separately, under Item 3 the superintendent recommended a single vote covering four candidates listed in the agenda (candidates 2–5). The board moved and seconded the recommendation and approved it 6–0. The meeting record does not provide the full names or individual candidate details in the spoken record; those items are listed on the published agenda.

Both actions were procedural votes taken early in the special meeting; board members did not request further debate during the recorded segments. The board then proceeded to a budget update and discussion about district staffing and funding contingencies.

Votes at a glance

• 2024–25 QV QV2 BOCES Administrative Budget — Motion to approve as printed on the agenda; outcome: approved 6–0. • Consolidated candidate vote (candidates 2–5) — Motion recommended by superintendent; outcome: approved 6–0.

The board did not identify a mover or seconder by name in the spoken record included in the transcript. The meeting moved on to a substantive budget discussion led by David Rich after these votes.