Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Learning Pre K topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident asks why Secaucus returned $1.3M pre-K grant; acting superintendent cites provider and facility issues
Summary
At a Secaucus School District board meeting, resident Anthony Granieri pressed the board for details after the district returned a $1.3 million pre-K grant; Acting Superintendent Charlie Voorhees said private providers failed to meet grant requirements, agreements were unsigned and facility constraints made immediate acceptance impractical.
Anthony Granieri, a Secaucus resident, told the Board of Education he was ‘‘frustrated’’ after district email notices said the board and acting superintendent had returned a $1,300,000 pre‑K grant and asked, ‘‘what happened?’’ Granieri called recent administrative departures ‘‘shambles’’ and said the grant was intended to expand preschool special‑education services and move the district toward universal pre‑K compliance.
Acting Superintendent Charlie Voorhees responded that district staff spent weeks assessing the grant and found multiple barriers. He told the board that a private provider listed as the district’s primary partner, St. Matthews, did not meet the grant criteria and that there were no signed agreements with private providers. Voorhees said the district runs a half‑day 4‑year‑old program in Mill Ridge School that can serve about 100 students but could not be reconfigured immediately to meet grant conditions without interior renovations and waivers. "We could not accommodate it," Voorhees said, describing bathroom proximity and classroom compliance issues that would have required waivers and extensive rearrangement of space.
Voorhees also said that, on the state application, the term "universal" traces to earlier state policy and that many private providers across New Jersey were withdrawing from such programs because of financial strain; he warned the board the district would have struggled to operate the program sustainably. Voorhees said the first year of the award was structured as about $1.5 million and the second year closer to $1.7 million, and that timing and provider availability affected whether and how the funds could be used.
Granieri said he did not find Voorhees’s explanation adequate and suggested the board reallocate some of a separate $500,000 federal diversity, inclusion and equity grant toward integrating preschool services. Counsel and board members declined to respond to personnel questions raised during public comment, citing privacy rules, but Voorhees answered questions about the grant eligibility and implementation challenges. The exchange closed without a formal board action on the grant during the meeting.
The board did not hold a vote to restore or reallocate the grant funds during the session; Voorhees said staff had investigated the issues and identified the compliance problems before the district became noncompliant with grant requirements.
