Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sex Work Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed bill to legalize brothels sparks health and trafficking debate, fails on floor
Summary
Delegates debated Senate Bill 9.20 to legalize licensed brothels with mandatory health oversight and consumer consent; supporters said regulation would allow better tracking of STIs and worker protections, while opponents warned it could enable trafficking and posed enforcement concerns. The bill failed (26 yes).
A bill to legalize brothels in Washington, introduced as Senate Bill 9.20, failed after floor debate and a division vote. The bill’s proponent described it as a regulatory framework that would register brothels, require written client consent, mandate regular testing and condom use, prohibit registered sex offenders from employment or patronage, and give workers the right to refuse any act at any time. The proponent said legalizing the industry would make health data and oversight possible and allow authorities to respond to outbreaks and other harms.
Delegates pressed the proponent on specifics during the 18-minute bill cycle. Questioners asked who would bear medical testing costs; the proponent said brothels would be required to cover testing and related doctors’ visits. On liability for sexually transmitted infections and pregnancies, the proponent said businesses would set contract terms and that the amendment provides a civil remedy in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct. Delegates also asked whether the bill requires condom use and whether internal (female) condoms would be covered; the proponent said the bill’s language requires condoms generally.
A number of delegates raised trafficking and enforcement concerns, pointing to Nevada as a U.S. example with different outcomes. The proponent acknowledged the potential for trafficking and said the bill would require brothels to register with local authorities, to provide hotlines and resources to workers, and to work with the Department of Commerce and local officials on inspection and oversight. Delegates asked how brothels would vet clients to ensure they were not registered offenders; the proponent said brothels would be criminally liable if they failed to verify and that owners would be required to perform checks.
After proponent and opponent remarks and extended questioning on health protections, consent, and monitoring, the chamber moved to a division. The presiding officer reported 26 votes in favor; because the simple majority threshold was 35, the bill did not pass. The chair reminded delegates that clapping was not in order and moved to the next item on the docket.
