Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Voting Rights topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Youth legislature rejects memorial to lower federal voting age to 16

Youth Legislature — Senate Chamber (YMCA Youth & Government) · May 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Delegates debated a memorial urging a constitutional change to lower the federal voting age to 16; proponents said it would increase youth engagement while the attorney general’s representative and several delegates said the measure is constitutionally infirm. The memorial failed on a voice vote.

The youth senate debated a memorial (Senate bill 8.13) urging national action to lower the federal voting age to 16, but delegates ultimately rejected the proposal.

The proponent on the floor argued that lowering the voting age would amplify youth voice and civic participation and that classrooms could provide the necessary instruction; the proponent said the bill includes in-school education to prepare young voters. Opponents across delegations countered that many schools do not offer consistent government coursework early enough and questioned whether 16- and 17-year-olds would be uniformly prepared. “I believe that political opinions of our nation’s youth are vital and valid,” the proponent asserted during opening remarks (proponent, S9).

The attorney general’s representative told the chamber the memorial raised constitutional problems, noting the 26th Amendment currently sets the federal voting age and that a state memorial could not itself change that requirement. The AG’s representative said delegates should consider the constitutional path for altering voting age rather than treating the memorial as an immediate policy fix (Attorney General rep, S12).

Delegates also raised practical points: curriculum gaps, uneven civic education across schools, and developmental concerns. Several speakers urged the body to consider alternative steps—such as improving civic instruction and local enfranchisement efforts—rather than a memorial that cannot itself alter federal law.

The chamber called for previous question and moved to closing remarks; after the final exchange the president announced that the memorial did not pass on a voice vote. The session proceeded to the next agenda item.