Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kiski Area SD officials outline cohort-based view of state test results, plan building-level responses
Summary
District leaders told the board that cohort tracking and growth reports — not single-year state averages — guide intervention work; they said Kiski outperformed state averages in several early grades and science but noted math proficiency dips in middle grades, and they outlined curriculum and retesting strategies.
District administrators on Monday framed the district’s recent state test and local-assessment results as a cohort story rather than a series of discrete year-to-year comparisons, and they told the Kiski Area SD board that principals will present building-level strategies in coming meetings.
The data presentation, led by district staff, explained the data timeline: students take state tests in April–May, the district receives raw early reporting in June, and phased PBOS growth/PA-index information reaches the public in October–November. The presenters said they use early spreadsheets and cohort charts to track the same group of students over several years and to design targeted interventions.
“We’re gonna take a little bit of a story-line approach tonight,” the district data presenter said, explaining why cohort tracking matters for interpreting trends. Presenters showed grade-by-grade charts comparing Kiski’s proficiency rates with state averages, noting that Kiski exceeded the state in several early-grade and science measures while showing declines across middle grades and certain secondary grade bands.
The presentation stressed how Keystone cohort reporting differs from one-time snapshot comparisons: Keystone subject results publish when an eleventh-grade cohort finishes that grade, and retest scores can be superscored to use students’ best module results. The district said it avoids holding students back based on a single test score, instead moving students forward in curriculum and creating targeted interventions when gaps appear.
Administrators described a recent curricular change: offering Algebra I to identified eighth graders who will focus on Algebra I content rather than on PSSA preparation alone. The presenters said that approach is expected to raise proficiency for students identified as ready for the higher course.
Board members asked about COVID-era gaps, module-level performance differences, and whether recent dips might reflect an off year. The district said COVID interrupted cohort charts, that many indicators are two-to-three years lagging, and that module performance can vary year-to-year, which is why principals and teachers will be using local formative assessments and professional learning communities to address learning needs.
The district emphasized the next steps: principals will present building-level evidence and tactics for addressing identified gaps, and administrators will continue to refine local assessments and vertical alignment across grade levels.
Board members thanked the administrative team for the presentation. The district did not present a final vote on any new policy at the meeting; presenters described planned building-level follow up at future meetings.
