Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education.testing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews state testing: administrators set an 8-point cohort goal and debate benchmarking and motivation
Summary
District leaders presented PSSA/Keystone and benchmark data and told the board they are targeting an 8 percentage‑point increase for cohorts and grade levels; board members pressed on test alignment, student motivation, time-on-task anomalies and requests for multi-year comparative data.
Administrators presented state and local assessment results and told the board they are prioritizing growth tracking by cohort and by grade level. During the presentation, the district framed the improvement target as an "8 percentage‑point" increase for grade levels under the Title I plan.
"8% growth is what we're looking for," an administrator said when describing the Title I goal; board members and administrators clarified that the plan uses an 8 percentage‑point bump (e.g., 66.2 percentage points to 74) rather than an 8 percent relative increase.
The presentation emphasized use of local benchmarking tools (DIBELS, CDTs, PBOS/PVOS reports) to diagnose gaps and to guide targeted interventions; a district consultant offered to arrange custom data consults to help principals and teachers dig into the PBOS reports and identify anchor skills for instruction.
Board members questioned whether observed declines were cohort effects, curriculum misalignment, or test‑taking behavior. One administrator flagged test‑taking motivation and "test exhaustion," noting repeated test attempts can depress apparent proficiency rates; another administrator said the district observed many students completing some exams very quickly (examples of students finishing in under 20 minutes), a pattern the panel agreed deserved follow‑up via time‑on‑task data and targeted interventions.
Suggestions raised included reordering tests (putting Algebra earlier in the test battery), strengthening formative assessment practices so teachers and teams can see growth between benchmarks, and producing comparative standardized-score summaries (SAT/ACT/PSAT) versus nearby districts to provide context.
Board members asked staff to produce a more concise, articulated PSSA improvement goal and supporting plan by the next board meeting so the district can begin targeted work earlier in the school year.
Clarifying details: the district is relying on DIBELS and SANUS (local benchmarks) for K–4 monitoring and CDTs/PBOS for diagnostic growth; a requested multi‑year summary of national standardized tests (SAT/ACT) and comparative data versus nearby districts was requested by a board member. Where raw vote counts or numeric goals for state PSSAs were not provided, the transcript recorded those figures as "not specified."
