Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs ordinance change to ease permitting for older garage enclosures
Summary
The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend TR25-08, a text amendment to Chapter 118 that would let certain older homes enclose garages without a variance if two on-site parking spaces can be shown; the amendment (with an 11/22/1999 date in the draft) will go to City Council Dec. 8.
The North Richland Hills Planning & Zoning Commission recommended Nov. 6 that City Council approve a text amendment to Chapter 118 of the zoning code intended to simplify permitting for older single-family homes that have converted garages.
City planner Corey (staff) told commissioners the draft language would treat garage enclosures on homes built on or before an identified date as nonconforming only if they create or enlarge a nonconformity, and the practical effect of the draft is to allow an owner to obtain a permit for a garage enclosure without needing a variance as long as the site can accommodate a minimum of two parking spaces meeting the city's 9-by-18 foot standard. "We're recommending a change to a kind of a flat across-the-board approval if the home has two parking spaces on the site," Corey said.
The staff draft references Nov. 22, 1999 as the last ordinance update that added the covered-and-enclosed parking requirement; the date distinguishes properties that were built with the covered parking requirement from older homes. Commissioners debated whether to keep that date cut‑off or make the standard uniform for all homes. Some argued the date creates an odd fairness line between homeowners; others said removing the date could create conflicts with the parking standard in the zoning tables and might require broader code edits.
Commissioners discussed enforcement history—staff said many garage enclosures were completed decades ago without permits—and variance practice, noting the Board of Adjustment may consider lot shape, cost and hardship when deciding variances. Commissioners also raised concerns about potential increases in front-yard paving if additional parking spaces are required; staff said lot-coverage and front-yard paving are a related but separate issue that the commission can address later.
After discussion, Commissioner Aaron moved to recommend TR25‑08; Commissioner Mike seconded. The motion passed 6‑0. Staff said the item is scheduled for City Council consideration on Dec. 8.
