Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

State education official tells committee fetal alcohol diagnosis would not automatically trigger an IEP

Committee on Education · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Harwood told the Committee on Education that a diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder does not, by itself, automatically create eligibility for an IEP under federal law; he reviewed evaluation, appeal and mediation processes and pointed members to Families Together as a parent resource.

The Committee on Education reopened discussion of a bill concerning fetal alcohol spectrum diagnoses and whether such a diagnosis should automatically lead to an Individualized Education Program (IEP).

"There is not a single medical diagnosis that automatically leads to an IEP," Dr. Harwood told the committee, explaining that eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) depends on an evaluation team’s findings about a student’s educational needs and ability to access a free and appropriate public education. Dr. Harwood walked members through the evaluation and appeal process, including district evaluations, parental rights documents handed out during evaluations, mediation and the State Department of Education’s role in investigations and orders when disputes arise.

On dispute resolution and parent supports, Dr. Harwood identified a contract-funded organization, Families Together (operating under a TASN umbrella contract), that provides an independent advocate and resources for families navigating special-education disagreements. Committee members asked whether Families Together publishes an annual evaluation report; Dr. Harwood said the contractor has an evaluation component and that staff would attempt to obtain the prior-year evaluation for the committee.

Dr. Harwood cautioned that if the legislature were to adopt a law declaring a specific diagnosis automatically entitled a student to an IEP, such a statute would conflict with federal law. "If the legislature were to enact a law that said a particular diagnosis gets an IEP, you would be in contradiction to federal law," he said, and the chair signaled she likely would not pursue that statutory route.

Committee members also discussed prevention and public-health approaches to fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and whether agencies such as the Kansas Department of Health and Environment would be the appropriate lead for prevention work.

The exchange ended with committee staff and Dr. Harwood agreeing to provide the committee with further materials about Families Together, the appeal process and the legal constraints that shape special-education eligibility.