Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Attempt to restore $200,000 to building fund fails for lack of second; capital plan amendment passes
Summary
At the February Montgomery County Legislature meeting, a lawmaker moved to amend Resolution 83 to return $200,000 to the building fund and take $500,000 from the equipment fund; the amendment received debate but no second and the resolution passed as presented.
A lawmaker moved to amend Resolution 83 during the Montgomery County Legislature’s February meeting, proposing to return $200,000 to the building fund and shift the full $500,000 deduction onto the equipment fund. The amendment failed for lack of a second and the legislature then passed Resolution 83 as presented.
The amendment was introduced by Speaker 5, who said the figures adopted in the capital improvement plan had shifted $200,000 out of a building line and only $300,000 out of the equipment line, and asked to reverse that step to restore building funding. "We want to take... and put the $200,000 back into the building fund," Speaker 5 said, arguing that some building maintenance — including window and generator work cited in committee estimates — should not be underfunded.
Speaker 4 answered detailed questions about the numbers and said the budget adjustment and breakdown were included in an attachment to the resolution. "It's in the attachment," Speaker 4 said, explaining that the plan had originally taken $200,000 from the building fund and $300,000 from equipment. During the debate Speaker 4 also summarized committee estimates discussed during the capital projects meeting.
Other lawmakers questioned whether alternate revenue sources could cover equipment purchases. Speaker 5 suggested options such as using CHIPS funds, renting equipment for the remainder of the year or identifying other revenue streams. Speaker 6 urged better dissemination of committee decisions to the full legislature before the meeting so members could review details in advance.
After discussion, the chair asked for a sponsor and a second for the amendment; no second was obtained and Speaker 1 said the body would "move on as is." The legislature then voted and passed Resolution 83 in its presented form.
The immediate effect is that the capital plan amendment contained in Resolution 83 will proceed as printed; speakers discussed but did not adopt the proposed reallocation during the meeting. The body also heard that committee members present at the capital projects meeting supported the plan as it was presented to the legislature.
Next steps: Resolution 83 was adopted at the meeting; the transcript indicates committee-level documents and an attachment contain the specific line-item breakdowns referenced during debate.
