Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Little Egg Harbor board approves preliminary budget, seeks $3.03 million in state tax-levy incentive aid

Little Egg Harbor Township Board of Education · April 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Little Egg Harbor Township Board of Education approved initial finance items and authorized an application for about $3.03 million in state tax-levy incentive aid to fund classroom staff and try to avoid educational layoffs; one board member voted no, citing the size of the tax increase and an upcoming reassessment.

The Little Egg Harbor Township Board of Education on March 2 approved initial finance items and authorized the district to apply for roughly $3,031,696 in state tax-levy incentive aid aimed at funding classroom staff and avoiding educational layoffs.

The action, taken at a special meeting, moves the budget process forward to a workshop on April 15 and a final budget vote on April 29. Board members said the application will focus on staffing costs — teachers, child-study team members and other positions that directly affect students — because state guidance indicates that focusing the request on educational programs improves the chance of approval. "This district is roughly $10,000,000 short of its local fair share," a district official, Robert, said, explaining that the state’s adequacy formula puts district needs at about $30 million while the local fair-share figure is about $24.8 million.

Why it matters: Board members said the tax-levy adjustment is intended to close the gap between what the state considers adequate funding and local revenue, and to prevent deep cuts that would affect class sizes and programs such as art, music and STEAM. "I couldn't imagine having a classroom of fourth graders of 45 students plus," the board president said, describing what members sought to avoid by supporting the preliminary budget.

Public comment and concerns: Parents, teachers and a reporter urged more clarity on projected tax impacts and on whether previously proposed staff reductions remain planned. Erin Savanera, a parent, told the board the district’s arts and specialist programs are essential and asked for transparency about rumored staff losses. Elizabeth Osgoodi, a Rockwell Elementary School teacher, asked why the district presentation on the website still contained outdated information and whether public-comment rules differ for special meetings. "I hope increased transparency within our community will help us all better comprehend what our schools will look like with the rumored significant losses to staff and increased class sizes," Savanera said.

Numbers and homeowner impact: The district official said it will apply for a little more than $3 million of the state-allowed amount and that, because the state funds only a small share of an awarded application, most of the increase would come from a higher local tax levy. He estimated that for an average assessed home in the township (assessed at $208,000 in the presentation), the proposed levy increase would amount to about $460 a year. The official said the district opted not to apply for the state’s maximum allowable amount because it does not need the full sum to cover educational staffing.

A dissenting vote: Board member Laura said she voted no, saying she could not support what she described as an excessive increase on taxpayers and cited an upcoming reassessment that could change homeowners’ tax burdens. "I cannot afford the 32% increase," Laura said, adding she would have supported a more moderate increase combined with expenditure reductions.

What’s next: The board directed staff to post an updated presentation to the district website with numbers approved at the meeting and scheduled a budget workshop for April 15 to review final figures ahead of the April 29 vote.

Votes and formal actions: The board carried motions to (1) move public comment to the end of the agenda, (2) approve the meeting agenda, and (3) approve finance items A and B and related budget actions to permit the district to submit the tax-levy incentive aid application. The board’s procedural votes were announced as carried; the transcript records the motions and that the motions passed.