Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town assessors and councilman brief Sachem board on assessments, equalization and IDA/PILOT effects
Summary
A Brookhaven Town assessor and Councilman Neil Manzella explained assessed value vs. taxable assessed value, grievance procedures, how the state equalization rate affects apportionment across towns, and how IDA/PILOT agreements can reduce district receipts for years; board members asked how those mechanics interact with district budgets and state-aid formulas.
Councilman Neil Manzella and Brookhaven Town assessor Felix Weinklawn gave an extended briefing to the Sachem Central School District Board explaining how property assessments, exemptions and the state equalization rate work, and fielded board questions about how those mechanics affect tax bills, levy apportionment and district revenue.
Manzella said homeowners often conflate market value, assessed value and taxable assessed value and walked the board through examples that show how assessed numbers convert to market values using the state’s equalization rate. He emphasized that exemptions (for seniors, firefighters, STAR, etc.) lower taxable assessed value but do not change the assessed or market values used in state calculations.
Weinklawn described the three state options for defining income when applying senior/disability exemptions (all starting from federal adjusted gross income but varying on inclusion of IRAs, annuities and full Social Security). He also explained the grievance process (Board of Assessment Review) and noted that assessment adjustments depend on the documentation residents supply.
On IDA/PILOT agreements, the assessors said these arrangements typically place an assessed value on a development but substitute a negotiated PILOT payment for ad valorem taxes for a fixed term (often decades), reducing immediate tax receipts to local taxing jurisdictions and sometimes creating revenue shortfalls for school districts when residential units arrive without a concomitant tax flow.
The presentation included local examples and averages (county and hamlet assessed-value averages) and an explanation of how the state compiles sales-sample data (Form 5217 submissions) to compute equalization rates used to apportion levy responsibility among towns within a district. Board members asked for timing details and were told equalization-rate updates typically arrive in late summer/early fall after the state compiles sales data.
Board reaction and follow-up: members thanked the presenters and asked staff to include the equalization-rate mechanics and any apportionment implications in future budget materials so the board can better anticipate year-to-year tax changes when setting district budgets.
Next steps: assessors and staff will provide supporting slides and the district will incorporate the explanation into upcoming budget packets and the board’s review of the proposed exemption-resolution impact.
