Panel advances bill letting experienced physician assistants practice without practice agreement after three years
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
The committee reported HB746, which would allow physician assistants with at least three years of full‑time clinical experience to practice without a supervising practice agreement after an attestation; testimony from practicing PAs cited workforce shortages and rural need. Committee vote: Ayes 12, Noes 2, 1 abstention.
Delegate Hansen presented HB746, which would authorize physician assistants who can document at least three years of full‑time clinical experience and receive an attestation from a collaborating physician or podiatrist to practice without a formal practice agreement.
Several physician assistants testified in support. "We have lots of needs, especially in primary care and rural care," Eric Grant, a PA and educator, told the committee, arguing that other states have adopted similar rules to expand access. Emily Waller, who practices in a HRSA‑designated rural health clinic, said the bill would help keep care available where physician recruitment has been difficult.
Committee members asked for comparative training data between PAs and nurse practitioners; witnesses responded that training lengths and clinical contact hours are roughly comparable, with PAs often having substantial clinical hours.
The clerk recorded the vote: Ayes 12, Noes 2, 1 abstention. The bill was reported out of committee.
Why it matters: Proponents said the change would expand access to care in underserved areas; opponents (if any) raised questions over training equivalence and oversight. The committee recorded the recommendation and the matter will move forward in the legislative process.
Provenance: Testimony and the roll call are recorded in SEG 941–1060 and SEG 1056–1059.
