Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Builder seeks approval for five new Kellerton home models and minor design modification

City of Frederick Planning Commission · February 17, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Keystone Custom Homes presented five new home models for the Kellerton community and requested a modification to allow small decorative 2x2 accent windows on several elevations; staff and commissioners questioned proportionality and confirmed other porch and masonry requirements are met.

Edward Mangold, representing Keystone Custom Homes, presented five new home models and one updated elevation for the Kellerton community at the Planning Commission workshop on Feb. 17. Mangold requested a modification to allow small 2-by-2 accent windows that depart from the design guide's recommended proportions; he characterized the windows as non-occupied dummy windows added to enhance elevation diversity.

Mangold walked commissioners through model types (including the Devonshire Normandy, Kipling entry model, Prescott, Bradbury, Livingston, and Preston) and said each elevation meets porch and masonry high-visibility requirements where applicable. He acknowledged a graphic error that showed a Prescott cottage elevation that the builder does not offer and said he will correct the presentation materials for the formal hearing.

Commissioner Temple requested clearer documentation of the modifications, and Commissioner Roby asked about allowed exterior materials; Roby specifically asked why fiber-cement Hardiplank was not listed as an allowed alternative. Mangold said material choices were coordinated with the developer and landowner during initial approvals but that Hardiplank could be proposed for review as part of permit submissions and architectural review.

Staff had no additional comments at the workshop and there was no public comment on this item; the commission indicated it would expect the applicant to address staff'generated questions at the formal hearing.