Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dental Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs bill authorizing dental‑anesthesia inspections after department says rule exceeded statutory authority
Summary
Lawmakers approved HB 584 to give statutory authority for dental anesthesia inspections after the Department of Labor and Industry acknowledged it had promulgated rules beyond its authority; supporters warned that without the bill the existing inspection regime could be repealed and 89 inspections would remain outstanding.
Representative Ed Buttry told the committee HB 584 would codify the Board of Dentistry’s anesthesia inspection authority into statute to match existing department rules and avoid the need to repeal those rules. "We got over our skis and we made a rule that goes beyond our statutory authority," said Sarah Swanson, commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry, who asked the committee to pass the bill to preserve patient‑safety inspections.
Commissioner Swanson gave detailed counts: the department licenses 927 dentists in Montana; about 164 hold an anesthesia endorsement (roughly 17 percent), with 55 dentists having permits for deep sedation and 109 for moderate sedation. The department reported 89 outstanding inspections that could not be completed while the statutory authority was in question and noted it contracts with practicing dentists to perform inspections because the agency lacks in‑house clinical inspectors.
Deputy chief legal counsel Jennifer Stahlkamp and industry witnesses (including the Montana Dental Association representative Webb Brown and vendors like PDS Health) described the bill as necessary to preserve oversight while acknowledging some stakeholders want broader statutory modernization (definitions and ownership language). Several industry representatives urged the committee to proceed while pursuing separate statutory updates; others warned that certain proposed amendments would change their support.
Committee members pressed staff on the inspection schedule (statutory/reinspection frequency outlined in the bill; witnesses said reinspection is periodic and often driven by time or disciplinary findings) and on how inspections are reported. Stahlkamp said inspections generate a written report returned to the board’s executive officer and can trigger board screening panel action if issues rise to unprofessional conduct.
Outcome: The committee voted to pass HB 584 and move it to the floor; during executive action members discussed, and later formed, a small select group to evaluate a House‑side amendment that would change definitions and potentially the bill title before final floor action.
