Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Washington Supreme Court hears dispute over whether post‑divorce military recall raises pension into marital property
Summary
At oral argument in Ray (marriage of Porter and Porter), attorneys disagreed over whether pension increases earned during an involuntary military recall are separate property under RCW 26.16 or part of the marital share; the court took the arguments and the case was submitted for decision.
The Washington Supreme Court on June 25, 2024 heard argument in Ray, the marriage of Porter and Porter, over whether pension increases earned during an involuntary military recall after a 1994 divorce should be treated as the servicemember’s separate property or included in the marital portion subject to division.
Appellant counsel John Higa argued that increases arising from the recall are separate property under state law and that the Court of Appeals erred in applying the community‑efforts doctrine. "Under RCW 26.16, the presumption is that the increase in the pension earned during the recall is his separate property because it was acquired after marriage," Higa told the court, warning that the appellate approach would "essentially allow the courts to usurp the statutes." Higa said the trial court’s 27% figure reflected a calculation method the appellant…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
