Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Washington Supreme Court considers whether defendants can withdraw pleas after Blake decision
Summary
In oral argument June 27, 2024, the Washington Supreme Court heard State v. Nicole Marie Williard, focusing on whether a defendant who pleaded guilty under a statute later held unconstitutional may withdraw that plea or should receive narrower relief such as vacatur of the possession conviction or resentencing.
The Washington Supreme Court heard argument June 27, 2024, in State v. Nicole Marie Williard over whether a defendant who pleaded guilty under a statute later declared unconstitutional may withdraw the plea. Petitioner counsel Aaron Moody asked the court to remand with instructions allowing Williard to withdraw an indivisible plea, while respondent counsel Joseph Jackson argued the Court of Appeals correctly found the pleas voluntary and that vacating the unlawful-possession count was the appropriate remedy.
Moody told the court that Williard concedes the codified simple-possession offense existed in 2003 but that the central question is whether a defendant who "agree[s] to be convicted and punished under a statute that completely exceeded the state's legitimate police power" may nonetheless be held to that…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
