Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Edtech topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Candidates differ on AI and cell‑phone policies for classrooms
Summary
In the AWB debate, Chris Reykdal said Washington has issued early AI guidance and a comprehensive media‑literacy strategy; challenger David Olson highlighted his district’s AI use and strict cell‑phone restrictions and urged statewide support for equitable access.
Moderated questions at the Microsoft‑sponsored debate focused on classroom technology, with both candidates arguing for preparing students to use new tools while raising concerns about distraction and equity.
Reykdal said Washington has issued early, phased guidance on artificial intelligence for schools and is pairing that guidance with student‑data privacy safeguards and media‑literacy standards so teachers can reshape instruction: "This is part of learning," he said of AI.
Olson described his school district as a national leader in AI integration and said district staff train teachers to use tools ethically while limiting misuse: "Our CTO flies around the nation, talking about our school district because we're so far ahead of the curve on AI," he said. Olson urged OSPI to fund districts that lack resources so AI access is equitable across the state.
On cell phones and discipline, Olson said restricting phones improved academic scores and mental‑health outcomes in his district. Reykdal defended a framework that respects local control while offering guidance, arguing a comprehensive media‑literacy approach and regulation in classrooms are needed to address off‑campus screen time as well.
