Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carrollton council asks staff to benchmark options for short‑term rental rules, including child‑safety zones and possible ban
Summary
Council heard a staff overview of eight categories of potential short‑term rental regulation and asked staff to return after the budget with benchmarks and legal/risk analysis; staff expects to present deeper analysis beginning in September and aims for an ordinance by December.
City staff outlined a menu of options for regulating short‑term rentals and council members asked staff to return with benchmarking, enforcement analysis and legal risk guidance.
Corey Heiple, Carrollton’s environmental services director, told the council the item was a high‑level discussion of eight topic areas staff had been asked to review following recent changes to Chapter 100 and the city’s interim processes. "Today's goal is just to highlight what those are," Heiple said, listing child‑safety zones (buffering STRs from schools, parks or daycares), density caps (limits on how many STRs in proximity or citywide), restricting commercial activities (for example prohibiting use as wedding venues), notification and special‑use permit processes, trafficking‑prevention training and signage, potential zoning changes for multifamily, review of current restrictions (noise, parking) and approval pathways (SUP vs Chapter 97 permitting).
Council members pressed on enforcement and practical effects: one member said concerns about background checks and screening should be addressed and asked whether STRs should be allowed in multifamily zones; another said enforcement—how complaints are handled and what penalties apply—should be a distinct section of analysis. Several council members supported including a possible citywide ban as an item for study; Mayor indicated the ban would be added as a consideration for staff review.
Heiple told council staff will return after the budget process, beginning in the second meeting in September, and will bring data, benchmarking and recommendations in monthly follow‑ups. "Our goal will be to have a final ordinance before council by December," Heiple said, adding that any ordinance would be timed so regulation is in place before an interim prohibition expires in May.
Council members also repeatedly asked staff to clearly define enforcement mechanisms and potential legal consequences if the city considers a ban; one member suggested staff present case studies and court outcomes from other cities and outline risks to local control and property‑rights litigation.
Next steps: staff will prepare benchmarking, legal risk assessments and enforcement scenarios and return with a sequence of work‑session items starting in September and monthly thereafter, aiming for a December ordinance to replace temporary measures.
