Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Council weighs ending scooter moratorium, voices safety and regulatory concerns

Pullman City Council · February 25, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilmembers discussed ending a moratorium on motorized scooters and e‑bikes and aligning code to permit sidewalk and off‑hours use. Members raised safety incidents, class distinctions for e‑bikes, and possible speed limits, education or registration as alternatives to continued moratoria.

City staff and councilmembers discussed whether to end a recurring moratorium on motorized scooters and e‑bikes during the Feb. 24 study session and asked staff to prepare code changes and safety options for future review.

Community Development staff explained the city’s current moratorium (effective through June 30, 2026) resulted from conflicts between existing code (chapter 12.1 and 12.11) and scooter use downtown. Staff asked whether the council wanted to replace repeated moratorium renewals with concise code changes that would allow scooters on sidewalks and during non‑daylight hours or whether to retain restrictions.

Councilmembers voiced a range of concerns and suggestions. Council member Wright recounted a personal family injury allegedly caused by a scooter and urged caution and some form of operator assurance before permitting motorized scooters on trails and sidewalks. Council member Parks and others noted wider sidewalks and off‑street trails that accommodate small vehicles and expressed support for lifting the moratorium and matching code to current practice while exploring safety measures.

Members raised technical questions about e‑bike classes (class 1, 2, 3) and the city’s current code, which does not differentiate classes; some members asked staff to consider speed limits for sidewalks or a classification/registration approach rather than a blanket removal of restrictions. Staff and the police department noted frequent conversations with enforcement partners and reported that, to date, major negligent uses have been limited, though minor, self‑inflicted injuries have occurred.

Council asked staff for a follow‑up that would stop automatic moratorium renewals and instead propose code updates and safety measures, potentially including vehicle classification, speed limits, education and a registration approach. Staff agreed to return with options for further council deliberation.

The council took no immediate ordinance action; the conversation closed with staff confirming next steps.